In this assignment, we will examine the specific solutions used in the case study analysis paper and the reasons for that approach. One of the main conclusions in the study was that the solution offered by the lawyer did not make sense to them because they felt they were victims and they deserved justice. A good number of issues raised during the study found support in the ethical case study solution applied in this assignment.
First of all, let us look at the main points in the case study solution applied in this assignment. The next sentence explains that they wanted to “make a difference in society”. The solution offered to them was a jail sentence of almost 10 years. On their part, they want to change the outcome of the case.
Based on this essay, it is clear that the main purpose of the study was not to see if the solution offered by the lawyer made sense to them, but rather how the attorney presented the facts. He presented his client as being the cause of the death, so that the family could be able to get some compensation. Based on this fact, the solution presented in the paper was clearly biased.
Now that we know that, we need to ask the question what does the client want? What do they expect the lawyers to do? If we ask this question, we can easily say that the clients want justice. The clients want what’s best for them and what’s best for the other party in the case.
How did the solutions presented in the essay show that there is justice for the two sisters? The solution presented in the case study solution was biased. It was based on the fact that the sister was involved in an illegal and violent crime. Because of this fact, the lawyer tried to show that the sister should be able to avoid a jail sentence.
Cases like these are often complicated. This is why there is not one “right” way to do things. Just because something makes sense in one case does not mean that it makes sense in another case. In order to make justice in a case, we have to consider different factors. In this case, we will consider the factors that helped the case improve in its resolution.
Two factors showed a positive outcome for the case. One of them was the persistence of the sisters. They did not give up, they continued to volunteer for different causes. The other factor is Lasa and Louise herself.
These two factors made Lasa and Louise the heroes. The results of the study show that the case was better for them because they became the heroes. Their persistence allowed them to continue working in the different organizations. The inclusion of these two factors in the paper shows that the solution should include these two factors.
The case was also improved because the laws allowed Lasa and Louise to choose a form of restitution. They could either do community service or give up their right to sue for damages. By doing this, it showed that these two women wanted to avoid the outcome of the case. This helped them. Since this case was based on the facts of the case and was done according to law, we can conclude that the case was successful. This was a good case because the outcome showed that Lasa and Louise wanted justice. to do their best to prevent being criminals in the future. and to change their behavior. become the kind of people they want to be.